City of Ottawa housing projects are banned on the National Interest Land Mass. According to the 1975-1976 National Capital Commission Annual Report, page 9/52:
The National Interest "Up until recent years, the NCC and its predecessors were in effect the only long-range planners for the National Capital Region. But as Ottawa, Hull and their surrounding communities grew, other jurisdictions began to assume their own and proper responsibilities for planning. Naturally, administrative conflicts have resulted.
Under the National Capital Act the Commission is responsible for protecting and promoting the national interest in the Capital. The objectives and purposes of the Commission are set out in the Act: "To prepare for and assist in the development, conservation and improvement of the National Capital Region in order that the nature and character of the seat of the government of Canada may be in accordance with its national significance."
It has been argued that only municipal authorities have the responsibility for promulgating and implementing region-wide plans in the National Capital Region. The Commission holds that this view is unconstitutional. Provincial and municipal authorities have responsibility for local concerns in their respective jurisdictions..."
The City of Ottawa cannot use federal property as a land bank - Google: "House of Commons Evidence, October 26, 2009": Mr. Al Speyers- "We support and share Minister Baird's concerns that the greenbelt should not be whittled away and serve as a land bank for municipal projects..."
The definition of the NILM "National shrines, the river and canal banks, the Confederation Boulevard, the Gatineau Park and the Greenbelt in the National Capital Region, considered essential to the realization of the vision of the Capital. There are 37 individual parcels of property in this category currently owned by the NCC on behalf of the government in perpetuity, for purposes which lie at the core of the NCC's mandate---and will be managed by the NCC with little or no further management involvement by the Treasury Board Secretariat." (From: 1988-09-15-TB-re-NCC Land Holdings.)
The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation should not have any involvement with Ottawa's Greenbelt: The Fifth Column by Richard Woodley of Kanata, November 22, 2007: Bill Teron's Plan to Destroy the Greenbelt "According to the Ottawa Citizen, 'Kanata's founder', developer Bill Teron, thinks that there are not enough people using the Greenbelt so we should develop it and build another Ottawa inside it. He states 'It's a gorgeous place, but very seldom do you see people within it. Here, a million people could connect'."
"In case you think you did not read this correctly Bill Teron wants to build a city of one million people inside our Greenbelt."
"According to the Citizen: 'Within the developed land, Mr. Teron envisioned small 'villages' of 5,000 to 10,000 people each, which would be developed around roads such as Woodroffe and Merivale."
"After all, what good are environmental lands with trails in them when you can have villages instead. And what good is greenspace without roads running through it, as Teron states: "We would be the only city in the world in which our ring roads run through a green paradise."
"As a regular user of the greenbelt I know people use it. They may not be crammed together on the trails or lined up on them like a ride at Canada's Wonderland but they are using the trails, and enjoying them because they are not congested. One can only imagine what putting a city of a million people inside it would do to the Greenbelt. Not being a fan of horror movies I would rather not imagine that."
"And yes, Teron has some novel ideas about adding to the greenbelt, but that would not make up for destroying what is there now. We all know what would happen if this plan is taken seriously---the negative parts of the plan would be implemented and then it would be discovered that the positive aspects are 'impractical' and 'unworkable'.'
"It is time for us all to stand up for the greenbelt."
Jacques Greber did not want local politicians involved with the Greenbelt. House of Commons Ottawa Evidence October 26, 2009 Mr. Al Speyers, Alliance to Save Our Greenbelt: "Jacques Greber felt that the only way to have a Greenbelt and keep it was that the most senior level of government in Canada would have to establish it, maintain it, keep it and preserve it. Cities are essentially vehicles for development. Their election campaigns are over 90% financed by the development industry."
Federal properties now owned by the city.
- the Ottawa Teacher's College on 195 Elgin Street is part of City Hall.
- the Mackenzie King and Laurier Avenue bridges over the Rideau Canal.
- DOC Telecommunications Engineering Lab on 1241 Clyde Avenue.
- Mooney's Bay Park is rented to the city.
- Beaver Barracks on 464 Metcalfe.
- 933 Gladstone, the Oak Park Armoury.
- the former Graham Spry CBC/CBOT building on 250 Lanark.
- former Canada Mortgage and Housing rowhouses across from the Adult High School on 300 Rochester. I attended the High School of Commerce during the early 1980's, and I still have my diploma.
- 1010 Somerset Street West was a Public Works and Government Services building.
Greenbelt Master Plan Review-Phase 1-Step C-Land Use Concept January 2012 Comments from the public:
- Potential removal of Greenbelt designation from the Nepean Sportsplex---A majority of respondents disagreed with removing the designation.
- Potential removal of Greenbelt designation from the Eagleson Park and Ride---There was opposition to the measure. "There is concern that potential 'removals' will see increased development." (pages 16 and 17 of 124 pages.)
House of Commons Ottawa June 22, 1992 Mrs. Beryl Gaffney (Nepean Ontario, Liberal) "The greenbelt was established to control urban sprawl, provide beauty to the nation's capital, and assist municipalities in local improvements such as cycling paths, the Stoney Swamp, the Pinhey Forest and the Log Farm. The people of Nepean are most concerned that the NCC is moving away from that premise. The majority of us in Nepean clearly don't want the greenbelt chipped away for residential or commercial development."